SaaS Entering Japan: Limited to Large Enterprises?

Introduction

Whether it’s creating a new revenue channel through focusing on a new territory or seeing demand from increased leads or customers, going after global revenue is a consideration for most businesses. There are tradeoffs to going after global revenue. Many parts need to be worked on which may distract teams from going after their core market.

To go after global revenue, teams have to internationalize their website and product. Internationalization is a technical project that is often underestimated in how long it takes to complete. On top of internationalization, there are a whole lot of go-to-market-related initiatives that need to be done. The initial efforts, including localization, which is key to to gain the trust of the local market, may seem like more of a cost than opportunity.

When Should SaaS Businesses Go Global?

The tradeoff of going global may seem big. There are always immediate fires that need to be put out. There are initiatives in the core market that may have higher priority. Going global seems like a mammoth-sized project, but if going global is done successfully, the rewards are great. Companies open up completely new channels. Companies that have nailed global expansion get up to 50% of their revenues from international markets:

So when should companies start considering global expansion? As early as possible!

Starting early does not mean to immediately start marketing in global markets. Starting early is creating an environment that allows companies to move quickly when the opportunity arises. One aspect of this is internationalization. Many companies don’t have internationalization in mind and have to rework and newly implement an internationalization-compatible environment. As for localization, SaaStr’s Jason Lemkin says that localizing early is a strategic weapon. Localization (i.e., translations and more) will need to happen. The longer you wait, the harder it gets, as the infrastructure gets more complex. Having awareness of internationalization and localization from the start will simplify the process when (not if) localization is needed. Localization is also important as buyers have a strong preference tools and platforms in their native language.

Considering Japan Market Entry?

Having leads and customers in a specific market is a good sign to consider localization. Especially in Japan, where the language is unique, early localization is necessary. As for setting up an entity, though talking about Europe, Jason Lemkin suggests having at least $1m-$2m of revenue before opening up a local office.

$1m-$2m of revenue seems like a pretty high hurdle to clear before setting up a local office. How can you get to $1m-$2m of revenue? There is a ton that can be done before reaching $1m-$2m mark and before setting up a local entity. Localization, sales, and marketing can be done without having a local entity if there’s someone who can speak the local language.

If not, working with resellers, distributors, or partners could be an option. Alternatively, companies can work with Japan entry partners like Nihonium.io. Integrate.io has had success in closing Japanese customers by with working Nihonium.io without going through the process of setting up an entity. Many people think that setting up a local entity is the first step of the process. The first step of the process is validating the market (Jason Lemkin’s market validation metrics is $1m-$2m in local revenue) and in actuality, setting up a local entity comes much later.

SaaS Businesses Entering Japan

More and more companies are seeing the opportunity to enter Japan, but the companies that enter Japan seem to be limited to large enterprises with $100m+ of revenues when they enter. These companies entering Japan make sense, as they are at a scale of having a dedicated strategy to go global. Taking a look at companies that have entered Japan through a joint venture or by setting up a local entity, they all have massive revenues.

Company Name Date of Entry Entry Type Revenue at Entry (Full Year Revenue of the Associated Month)
Braze October 2020 Joint Venture $96m total revenue
Coupa April 2021 Joint Venture $541.6m total revenue
Gainsight April 2022 Joint Venture $100m+ ARR in 2020
Kong April 2017 Joint Venture $100m+ ARR in 2023
Mirakl November 2023 Joint Venture $160m ARR
ncino October 2019 Joint Venture $91.5m total revenue
New Relic August 2018 Joint Venture $355m total revenue
PagerDuty May 2022 Joint Venture $281.4 total revenue
Walkme February 2019 Joint Venture $105.13 total revenue
Xactly October 2021 Joint Venture No data available
Figma March 2022 Entity $400m+ total revenue
Deel December 2021 Entity $238m total revenue
Hubspot February 2016 Entity $271 total revenue
DocuSign November 2015 Entity $250.48 total revenue
Okta September 2020 Entity $835m total revenue
Snowflake November 2019 Entity $264.75 total revenue
DataDog November 2019 Entity $362.8 total revenue

Considering Japan Market Entry?

Japan Entry Lagging

Japan is highly opportunistic, as SaaS adoption is growing and is at the beginning stages, but Japan entry to date has been limited to large enterprises that have already had success in their core markets. As a result, the software available in Japan ends up lagging. Companies in the US that are established make it to Japan. Innovative companies that challenge the incumbent don’t make it to Japan until they become ubiquitous tools. That being said, there are limited domestic solutions to fill the gap, creating a lag in Japan’s software market.

Part of the issue is that there are limited ways for SMB SaaS businesses to enter Japan. All the existing options are limited to large enterprises. There is a lot of opportunity for SMB SaaS businesses, as there is a lot of whitespace up for grabs. If these companies can navigate through the nuances unique to the Japanese market, these companies can be thought leaders in markets that are more saturated in other global markets.

Conclusion

SaaS businesses should go global as early as possible. Setting up a local entity is not the first step in going after a specific territory. Localization, sales, and marketing can all be done without a local entity. That being said, deals are much more likely to close with a local presence, including local support, which can also be done without a local entity.

The opportunity is great for SMB SaaS companies in Japan. SaaS companies that enter Japan are large enterprises that have proven product market fit in their core market. These companies have $100m+ in revenues. As a result, there is a lag software available in the Japanese market, as SMB SaaS companies that challenge the incumbent have limited options for Japan entry. The whitespace that’s up for grabs is a huge opportunity for SMB SaaS companies, if they are able to validate and enter the Japanese market in a low risk way. If you’d like to discuss Japan entry, book a consultation here!

 

Want a customized Japan market entry strategy?

Start typing and press Enter to search

Shopping Cart
en_USEnglish